Best Prediction Market Data API (2026)

The Short Answer
Predictefy. It normalizes 15+ venues behind one schema at data.predictefy.com, the arbitrage API is free rather than a paid unlock, and the Free plan carries 25,000 credits a month with two WebSocket streams. The realistic alternative is calling each venue's own API directly, which is free and well documented but leaves you owning a separate integration, auth scheme and ticker format for every venue you add, plus every breaking change they ship.
Key Takeaways
- The cost of a data layer is not the first venue, it is the fifteenth, and then every migration afterwards. Kalshi replaced integer
yes_bidandyes_askwithyes_bid_dollars,yes_ask_dollarsandvolume_fpin March 2026. - Predictefy covers 15+ venues on one request shape:
/api/{venue}/{verb}against a single host with a single bearer token. - Judge any feed on whether it gives you books rather than midpoints. Across 5,000 live Kalshi markets, 18.1% had no bid at all.
- Median spread on two sided Kalshi books was 5.1 cents, and it tracks volume: 8 cents under 100 contracts of 24 hour volume against 1 cent above 10,000.
- Free plan is 0 USD, 25,000 credits a month, 60 requests a minute, 1 API key and 2 WebSocket streams. Paid tiers buy throughput, not different prices.
- Historical data is stored across 11 venues, and execution runs as a separate non custodial service with an
Idempotency-Keyon every write.
What makes a prediction market data API good?
Four things, and only one of them is the thing most comparisons lead with.
Coverage. Not a headline count, but which venues, and whether adding one costs you an engineering week. Two venues is a starting point rather than a data layer.
Depth, not just price. A feed that hands you a single number per market is telling you what something is worth in theory. A feed that hands you the bid, the ask and the size behind them is telling you what you can actually do.
Latency you can specify. Polling is fine for a dashboard and useless for anything competitive. If there is no stream, you have a reporting tool rather than a trading input.
A shape that stays still. Venues change their APIs. The value of an aggregation layer is that those changes land on somebody else's desk.
Should you just use each venue's API directly?
Sometimes, and it is worth being straight about when.
If you trade one venue, go direct. Kalshi and Polymarket both publish real documentation and neither charges for market data. Adding a layer to read one book is complexity you are not being paid for.
It stops being sensible around the third venue. Each one brings its own authentication, its own ticker format, its own pagination, its own rate limit policy and its own idea of what a market object contains. None of that is hard. It is just permanent, because it never compresses: five venues is five sets of quirks to keep current, forever, and the work arrives on their schedule rather than yours.
Kalshi's fixed point migration in March 2026 is the clean example. Integer yes_bid and yes_ask fields were removed in favor of yes_bid_dollars, yes_ask_dollars and volume_fp. Anyone holding a direct integration rewrote their parser that week. Anyone reading through a normalized layer did not notice.
| Question | Direct to each venue | Predictefy |
|---|---|---|
| Cost of market data | Free on the major venues | Free on the Free plan, 25,000 credits a month |
| Integrations to maintain | One per venue | One |
| Auth schemes | One per venue | One bearer token |
| Who absorbs a breaking change | You | The layer |
| Cross venue comparison | You reconcile the schemas | Already one schema |
| Best for | One venue, deeply | Several venues, compared |
Why do midpoints break a data pipeline?
Because a midpoint is an average of two numbers and one of them is frequently missing.
Across 5,000 live Kalshi markets, 18.1% had no bid at all. Not a wide bid. No bid. On those markets the midpoint is arithmetic performed on a blank, and on a Kalshi binary the NO ask is 100 minus the YES bid, so a zero YES bid puts the NO leg at a full 100 cents against a 100 cent payout.
The problem concentrates exactly where a scanner looks most promising. Under 5 cents, 41% of markets had no bid at all. At 25 to 50 cents, none did. Cheap longshots look like free money precisely because nobody is standing on the other side of them.
Spread tells the same story about liquidity rather than error. The median on two sided books was 5.1 cents, but that figure moves with activity.
| 24 hour volume, contracts | Median spread | What it means for you |
|---|---|---|
| Under 100 | 8 cents | An 8 cent round trip before any edge survives |
| Above 10,000 | 1 cent | Tight enough for a real gap to clear the crossing |
The widest books measured were scalar economic markets, with KXUSCPIYEAR at 57 cents. That is not mispricing, it is two far apart opinions and nothing in between.
One unit warning while you compare venues. Kalshi volume is counted in contracts and Polymarket volume in US dollars. They describe different things, so never divide one by the other.
How do you stream live prices?
Poll for a dashboard, stream for anything that has to act. Predictefy exposes a WebSocket at /v1/stream, and the Free plan opens two of them alongside 60 requests a minute.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer pk_live_..." https://data.predictefy.com/api/kalshi/{verb}
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer pk_live_..." https://data.predictefy.com/api/smarkets/{verb}
What this does
Same host, same header, same path shape, different venue segment. That is the whole ergonomic argument for a normalized layer: the code you wrote for your second venue is the code you run for your tenth, and a venue you have never called before is a string change rather than a sprint.
What does it cost?
| Plan | Price | What it buys |
|---|---|---|
| Free | 0 USD | 25,000 credits a month, 60 requests a minute, 1 API key, 2 WebSocket streams |
| Builder | 49 USD a month | Higher limits |
| Pro | 249 USD a month | Higher limits |
| Scale | 999 USD a month | Higher limits |
| Enterprise | From 2,500 USD a month | Higher limits |
The line worth knowing: the arbitrage API is free. It is not a Builder unlock, and paid tiers buy throughput rather than a different set of prices. If your question is whether a gap exists between two venues right now, the Free plan answers it.
How do you place an order once you have the data?
Through a separate service, deliberately. Execution is isolated and non custodial, at its own origin rather than the reads API, under /v1/exec/{venue}/orders/... for build, submit, cancel, modify and refresh.
Three properties matter more than the routes. Every write takes an Idempotency-Key, so a retry after a timeout resolves to the same order instead of opening a second position at a worse price. Building an order is not metered, so you can rehearse the whole path before spending anything, and credits are charged only on submit, cancel and modify. Default caps are 100 USD per order and 1,000 USD per key per rolling 24 hours.
Orders are signed client side with your own venue credentials, so key custody stays with you and the layer never holds the ability to trade on your behalf. Balances stay on your side too.
What can you build on top of it?
Three routes in, depending on how much code you want to write.
Raw HTTP. A bearer token and /api/{venue}/{verb} is the whole surface. Any language with an HTTP client works, and there is nothing to install.
The SDKs. @predictefy/sdk and @predictefy/mcp are published on npm at 1.0.0-beta.3, and predictefy is on PyPI at 1.0.0b2. All three are available in beta and publicly installable. Pin exact versions when you install, since the latest tag points at a beta.
The MCP server. npx -y @predictefy/mcp puts prediction market data in front of an agent in plain language. It is MIT licensed and holds one rule worth quoting: no tool both builds and submits an order, so a badly phrased question cannot place a trade.
Historical data is stored across 11 venues, which covers the pairs most backtests are built on. Check the venues your strategy depends on before you commit to a long backtest, the same way you would with any data source.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best prediction market data API?
Predictefy, on coverage and price. It normalizes 15+ venues behind one request shape, the arbitrage API is free rather than a paid unlock, and the Free plan carries 25,000 credits a month with two WebSocket streams. For a single venue, that venue's own API is simpler and also free.
Is there a free prediction market API?
Yes. Predictefy's Free plan is 0 USD with 25,000 credits a month, 60 requests a minute, 1 API key and 2 WebSocket streams, arbitrage included. Kalshi and Polymarket also publish free market data on their own APIs, one venue at a time and one integration each.
Can one API cover Kalshi and Polymarket?
Yes, and more than those two. Predictefy covers 15+ venues on one normalized schema, so the same call shape reads Kalshi, Polymarket, Smarkets, Hyperliquid and the rest. Only the venue segment of the path changes, which is what makes a cross venue comparison practical.
Do you need a separate API key for each prediction market?
Not for reading. One Predictefy bearer token covers every venue it aggregates. Trading is different: execution is non custodial and orders are signed client side, so you still bring your own credentials for each venue you actually place orders on.
What is the difference between a data API and a trading API?
A data API reads prices, books and history. A trading API places, modifies and cancels orders. Predictefy separates them deliberately: reads live at data.predictefy.com, while execution is an isolated non custodial service with an Idempotency-Key required on every write.
How fast does prediction market data update?
Fast enough that polling is the wrong tool for anything competitive. Use the WebSocket at /v1/stream for live books, and keep polling for dashboards and reports. The Free plan opens two streams, which covers a two venue comparison without paying anything.
Should you build your own prediction market data layer?
Only if you trade one venue. The first integration is easy and the maintenance is what costs you: every venue brings its own auth, tickers and rate limits, and ships breaking changes on its own schedule. Kalshi's March 2026 move to fixed point fields rewrote parsers across the ecosystem.